I could write a Why I like Twitter article, but I’m not even sure what to put inside.
So I guess you know what is Twitter: a bunch of people who want the world to know they’re pooping. Yes, it’s useless. And don’t tell me it changed anything in Iran, because it didn’t. I’ve compiled all the stuff I hate about Twitter. Here they are, and it’s totally subjective.
First, Twitter is currently the most egocentric thing we’ve ever seen to date. Most people just want to be followed, the world has to know about their life. So followers matter, even more than the equivalent “friend-requests” on Myspace or Facebook. My point is that it’s mostly write-only: when someone follows more than 100 guys, you can be sure he/she won’t read it. You say “web 2.0” , I say “web 1.0“.
It’s useless. The retention rates (60% of Twitter users do not return after a month) are the consequences. I’m also pretty sure that the number of people using Twitter like it was originally meant for (human tweets, no feed, no massive RT) is remarkably low.
Twitter is centralized: there’s only one entry point to the network. A government could easily shut it down by filtering any request to twitter.com. And, more pragmatically, it could go down. And it went. While a decentralized system would simply prevent a small portion of users from accessing the whole network, a centralized one just crashes. We can find many decentralized systems out there, starting with email, which is a robust technology.
I want Twitter to die. And I want it to be resurrected with modern technologies based on rock, like email addresses. Yes, your email address could have been your identity if the network was decentralized. I’m expecting a lot from StatusNet, and even more from Google Wave (BTW, if you have an invite…), which seems to provide a more general approach than Twitter based on email look-alike XMPP . Twitter is a burden for the web. Since everybody use it, you have to use it, even if it’s terribly designed.
- Load balancing, have you heard of it?
- Why the fuck did you choose “pull” architecture instead of “push“? Simplicity‽
- Reply to tweets instead of people, that hard?
- Tweet edition, can’t do?
- Nobody use SMS to tweet. You should remove the 140-character limit.
It’s slowly replacing RSS. What a terrible news since RSS was also designed to be decentralized. Moreover, a RSS stream can embed full article, while Twitter is just indirections and redirections. Everything depends on another service. For instance, if bit.ly goes down, Twitter dies. Talking about shorteners: URLs used to have a meaning, a value, but they ruined it — stupid limit.
It is said to be a network of people and sharing. So why the fuck did brands and spammers invade it? Ok, I know why, no need to tell me. What I need to know is how many accounts are really useful for the network? Lay off any aborted account, any porn spammer, any auto-following brand, any “@naruto666 lol” user, any “Hey, did you know Disney bought Marvel?” retweeter. Seriously, how many? 1%? Less? How can investors trust such a fake network? Too many questions… The whole point is that they want to make money out of something which worth nothing. And one day, they’ll find out that Twitter advertisement is just stupid and unadapted.
The information is duplicated (or “retweeted”), because after all, Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, blogs, whatever… are the same. They’re just a stream of (dis)information from people you trust (or not). I can’t stand it. Twitter is the opposite of what we’re trying to build with the Semantic Web. Yes, we want the web to come to us instantly, but does it provide access to news by topic, efficient and global search, or simply identity? No, the only thing you can do is search by keywords, not even semantic field: we need filters that Twitter doesn’t have (neither any other social network). Data used to be easily accessible, now it’s just mess and noise. Like IM, it’s not meant to be persistent. But it is. Therefore, we have to filter content ourselves, while it’s the machine’s job! Today, we’re just using stupid ‘#’ because the service can’t provide proper indexing. Don’t forget that instant is not the opposite of tidied.
It’s fun to see reactions on Twitter, it’s like flame wars. You don’t know anything about what just happened but you still give your say. Hiding in the mass of instant reactions, it’s too easy to spead fake — or biaised — information. It’s also super easy to spread stupid uncritical point of views, which is a well-known “now”-ness effect. Like I read somewhere, people are ODing on digital courage.
Traveling Wilburys — Tweeter and the Monkey Man (1988):